Video: How Does WebRTC Differ From HLS?
Learn more about WebRTC at Streaming Media's next event.
Watch the complete video of this presentation from Streaming Media West, VES203. WebRTC: The Future Champion of Low Latency, in the Streaming Media Conference Video Portal.
Read the complete transcript of this clip:
Dr. Alex Gouiallard: Let's go a little bit into the theory. What we're about to see is different from HLS. I'm pretty sure there are more people knowledgeable about HLS in the room than WebRTC.
If you look at a one-way media streaming pipeline, you have a media capture that touches the hardware, then you have the media engine and encoder on the sender side. On the receiving side, you have a decoder, but basically it's the same stack.
You can optimize a lot of things if you're not live. If you have prerecorded content, then basically all the encoding part, all the sending part can actually be done with an infinite amount of time. That Batman movie from '99 on Netflix has been around for a lot of time. You can do 4-pass or even 20-pass encoding. Netflix is doing a lot of very smart things there to actually optimize the encoding so the resulting file in the middle that's going to be stored, is going to be the smallest possible.
You can upload everything. On the download, you can also do a little bit on the transport. When people hear that they're about to see the thing right away about peer file or stream route, you draw two companies that use the P2P parts, not the media part of we're about to see, to actually optimize the distribution.
Instead of going from the CDN server to the players, each of the viewers that are looking at the same movie, at the same time will be able to share some of the chain together. You have some of the chain coming to you from the CDN and some of the chain coming through P2P connection to other people watching the same movie.
But you still need after to take care of the DRM, put the chain back together, play them, and display them, and there the resilience of the transport and all those steps to different network condition or variation are based on buffering technique.
HLS, by contrast, is a file-based, http-based technology. What we're about to see with WebRTC is direct streaming.
Related Articles
CosMo Software Consulting Founder & CEO Dr. Alex Gouaillard rolls out predictions for WebRTC technology in 2020 in this clip from his Video Engineering Summit presentation at Streaming Media East 2019.
04 Nov 2019
CosMo Software Consulting Founder & CEO Dr. Alex Gouaillard discusses the non-realtimeness of WebRTC encoders and how Netflix and others compensate on the decoding end in this clip from his Video Engineering Summit presentation at Streaming Media East 2019.
28 Oct 2019
videoRX CTO Robert Reinhardt discusses the benefits and drawbacks of RTSP compared to other protocols for mobile app development in this clip from his presentation at Streaming Media East 2019.
07 Aug 2019
videoRX CTO Robert Reinhardt demonstrates the benefits and drawbacks of HLS and DASH in this clip from his presentation at Streaming Media East 2019.
31 Jul 2019
It's not a standard yet, but that will likely change. Here's a detailed look at the state of WebRTC, the project that could finally deliver instantaneous video streaming at scale.
19 Apr 2019
Video Rx CTO Robert Reinhardt discusses the value of knowing your requirements when selecting a video player in this clip from his presentation at Streaming Media West 2018.
20 Mar 2019
Video Rx CTO Robert Reinhardt discusses the benefits and drawbacks of SRT (Secure Reliable Transport) in this clip from his presentation at Streaming Media West 2018.
01 Mar 2019
VideoRx CTO Robert Reinhardt discusses the benefits and drawbacks of WebRTC in this clip from his presentation in the Video Engineering Summit at Streaming Media West.
21 Dec 2018
There's a cost to being cutting-edge, and for low-latency live video streaming that involves learning WebRTC and accepting limited browser support.
20 Jul 2018